“In the Shadows of Justice: The Battle for Balance in Trump’s Legal Odyssey”
Stay informed with in-depth analysis and real-time updates on critical global developments. Support independent journalism and help us continue providing valuable insights:
Join our community on Patreon: Patreon.com/BerndPulch
Make a direct contribution: BerndPulch.org/Donations
Your support ensures that we can keep delivering the truth. Every contribution makes a difference!
Read the Original Document at
https://t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL/46727
Title: “Trump Files Notice of Automatic Stay in New York Criminal Case, Citing Presidential Immunity”
Introduction:
In a dramatic legal maneuver, former President Donald J. Trump has filed a Notice of Automatic Stay in the New York Supreme Court, seeking to halt all criminal proceedings against him, including a scheduled sentencing hearing on January 10, 2025. The filing, submitted on January 5, 2025, argues that Trump’s pending appeals on Presidential immunity grounds automatically trigger a stay under federal constitutional law, as established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024). This latest development in Trump’s ongoing legal battles raises critical questions about the limits of Presidential power, the separation of powers, and the role of state courts in prosecuting a former—and potentially future—President.
The Legal Battle: Presidential Immunity and the Automatic Stay
At the heart of Trump’s filing is the argument that Presidential immunity—a constitutional doctrine that shields a sitting President from criminal prosecution for official acts—extends to his current legal predicament. Trump’s legal team contends that the New York court’s denial of his Post-Trial Presidential Immunity Motion on December 16, 2024, and its subsequent refusal to dismiss the case on January 3, 2025, were legally erroneous. As a result, Trump has initiated appellate proceedings to challenge these rulings, arguing that the commencement of such appeals automatically stays all further criminal proceedings under federal law.
Key Arguments:
- Automatic Stay Under Trump v. United States:
- Trump’s legal team cites the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States, which held that Presidential immunity includes the right to an interlocutory appeal before trial. The Court emphasized that the “essence of immunity is its possessor’s entitlement not to have to answer for his conduct in court” and that forcing a President to undergo trial or sentencing while an immunity appeal is pending would “deprive immunity of its intended effect.”
- The filing argues that the automatic stay is not discretionary but mandatory, as it is rooted in the separation of powers doctrine and the need to protect the institution of the Presidency from undue burdens of litigation.
- Sitting-President Immunity:
- Trump also raises the issue of sitting-President immunity, which he claims extends to the transitional period before his inauguration as the 47th President of the United States. His legal team argues that the New York court’s decision to proceed with sentencing just ten days before his scheduled inauguration on January 20, 2025, violates this immunity and risks imposing unconstitutional restrictions on his ability to govern.
- Evidentiary Misuse of Official Acts:
- Trump’s appeal challenges the admission of evidence related to his official acts as President, which he claims were improperly used to secure his conviction. The filing argues that such evidentiary misuse “eviscerates” Presidential immunity by allowing a jury to scrutinize official conduct, thereby undermining the separation of powers.
The Broader Implications: A Constitutional Showdown
Trump’s filing is not just a legal maneuver—it is a constitutional showdown with far-reaching implications. The case raises fundamental questions about the limits of Presidential power, the role of state courts in prosecuting federal officials, and the extent to which a President can be held accountable for actions taken while in office.
Key Issues:
- Separation of Powers:
- The filing underscores the separation of powers doctrine, arguing that the judiciary lacks the authority to adjudicate criminal claims against a President for actions taken within his constitutional authority. This argument is particularly relevant given Trump’s impending return to the White House, which his legal team claims makes the case against him even more untenable.
- State vs. Federal Authority:
- The case also highlights the tension between state and federal authority, as Trump’s legal team argues that New York courts are bound by the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings on Presidential immunity under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
- Political Motivations:
- Trump’s filing repeatedly characterizes the prosecution as politically motivated, accusing the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (DANY) of rushing to secure a conviction before his inauguration. The filing suggests that the case is part of a broader effort to undermine Trump’s political career and influence the upcoming election.
The Human Cost: A President Under Siege
Beyond the legal and constitutional issues, Trump’s filing paints a picture of a President under siege, forced to defend himself against what he describes as a meritless prosecution while preparing to assume the highest office in the land. The filing argues that forcing Trump to undergo sentencing and judgment while his immunity appeals are pending would impose an unconstitutional burden on the Presidency, potentially undermining the “vigor” and “energy” of the Executive Branch.
Key Concerns:
- Rushed Sentencing:
- Trump’s legal team criticizes the New York court’s decision to schedule a sentencing hearing just seven days after denying his motion to dismiss, calling it a “highly expedited” process that violates his due process rights. The filing argues that the rushed timeline is designed to ensure a conviction before Trump’s inauguration, rather than to serve the interests of justice.
- Potential Restrictions on Liberty:
- The filing raises concerns about the potential imposition of travel restrictions, reporting requirements, and probationary conditions as part of any sentencing, which Trump’s legal team argues would be constitutionally intolerable for a sitting President.
Conclusion: A Call for Accountability and Transparency
Trump’s filing is a bold attempt to halt what he describes as a politically motivated prosecution and to assert his constitutional rights as a former and future President. The case raises critical questions about the limits of Presidential power, the role of state courts in prosecuting federal officials, and the extent to which a President can be held accountable for actions taken while in office.
However, this legal battle is far from over. As Trump’s appeals move forward, the courts will be forced to grapple with unprecedented constitutional questions that could reshape the balance of power between the branches of government. For now, the filing serves as a stark reminder of the high stakes involved in prosecuting a former—and potentially future—President.
How You Can Help:
Investigative journalism like this requires resources, courage, and unwavering commitment. Berndpulch.org has been at the forefront of uncovering hidden truths and exposing corruption, but we rely on the support of our readers to continue this vital work.
- Donate to Berndpulch.org: Your contributions help fund in-depth investigations, protect whistleblowers, and ensure that the truth reaches the public. Visit berndpulch.org/donations to make a secure donation today.
- Support Us on Patreon: Join our community of supporters on Patreon.com/berndpulch. By becoming a patron, you gain exclusive access to behind-the-scenes content, early releases, and the satisfaction of knowing you’re part of the fight for transparency and justice.
Every dollar counts. Your support enables us to continue shining a light on the dark corners of global corruption, holding the powerful accountable, and advocating for a fairer, more transparent world. Together, we can make a difference.
❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org
As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…
MY BIO:
FAQ:
@Copyright Bernd Pulch
CRYPTO WALLET for
Bitcoin:
0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb
ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect
0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f
Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks
bmp
0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b
Monero
41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh
GOD BLESS YOU
Bernd Pulch 